Public Interest Litigation in environmental law empowers citizens, addresses challenges, and ensures legal accountability. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a strong legal tool that allows citizens or organisations to take legal action on behalf of the public, especially when an issue affects the community as a whole rather than just individuals. PIL started in India in the 1970s and made it easier for people to seek justice. It helps ordinary people, who may not have easy access to the legal system, address issues like environmental protection, human rights, and other public concerns.
PIL grew out of the need for social and environmental justice. It has played a key role in protecting public resources like rivers, forests, and wildlife from harmful development. By making it easier for people to bring important cases to court, PIL ensures that public interests are protected for both present and future generations.
Keep reading, as this article explores everything about the Public Interest Litigation. We’ll primarily focus on the role of PIL in environmental protection, along with its origin and history, challenges and criticism, eligibility to file PIL, and a few illustrations of PIL.
Origin and History of Public Interest Litigation
The concept of PIL was introduced in India during the 1970s, primarily through the efforts of visionary judges like Justice P.N. Bhagwati and Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer.
They expanded the principle of locus standi (the right to bring a case to court) to include public-spirited citizens. This allowed anyone to file a case for the benefit of the general public, especially on matters like environmental conservation.
Role of Public Interest Litigation in Environmental Law
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is an important tool for protecting the environment, especially in a country like India where courts actively address environmental issues. PIL allows individuals, organisations, or even the judiciary to act in the public’s interest, ensuring environmental laws are followed. Public Interest Litigation in environmental law empowers citizens, addresses challenges, and ensures legal accountability.
PIL has helped tackle problems like pollution, deforestation, and resource depletion by giving people and communities a way to raise concerns. It bridges the gap between environmental laws and their enforcement, ensuring that marginalized groups can fight against environmental damage.
Courts use PIL to promote principles like sustainable development, the right to a healthy environment, and the public trust doctrine, holding polluters accountable and protecting natural resources for future generations. India has seen significant cases driven by PIL, such as M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India.
In addition, PIL has influenced environmental action across the world as well, including in places like Brazil, where it has been used against illegal logging in the Amazon, and South Africa, where it addressed pollution from mining. It has given communities worldwide a way to hold governments and corporations accountable for environmental harm.
Even though PIL has been successful, it faces some challenges like court delays, unclear rules, and sometimes being misused for personal or political reasons.
Overall, Improving how PIL works and fixing these issues can make it even more effective in protecting the environment, both in India and around the world.
What are some Challenges and Criticism of PIL in Environmental Protection
Challenges and Criticism of Public Interest Litigation in Environmental Law:
Overreach of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers
Through PILs, courts often intervene in matters typically handled by the executive branch. Critics argue this disrupts the separation of powers, a fundamental principle of democracy.
Such interventions can blur constitutional boundaries and may lead to a perception of judicial overreach, affecting trust in the judiciary.
Risk of Frivolous or Misused PIL
Not all PILs serve the greater good. Some are filed with ulterior motives, such as personal gain or political vendettas. These frivolous or insincere PILs waste valuable judicial resources and diminish the credibility of PIL as a tool for justice. Calls for stricter screening of PIL petitions have grown louder in response.
Delayed Judicial Process
The Indian judicial system is already burdened with a significant backlog of cases, and PILs add to this workload. Environmental cases often require swift action, but delays in hearings and judgments can reduce the impact of these interventions. This is particularly critical for issues like pollution or deforestation, where time is of the essence.
Lack of Well-defined Standards or Guidelines
The Indian judicial system is already burdened with a significant backlog of cases, and PILs add to this workload. Environmental cases often require swift action, but delays in hearings and judgments can reduce the impact of these interventions. This is particularly critical for issues like pollution or deforestation, where time is of the essence.
Implementation and Compliance Issues
Even when courts deliver favourable rulings in environmental PILs, enforcing these decisions is a significant challenge. Bureaucratic delays, lack of funds, and opposition from powerful vested interests often hinder the implementation of court orders, limiting their real-world impact.
Balancing Environmental Conservation with Development
India’s fast economic growth sometimes clashes with the need to protect the environment. Courts often have to find a middle ground between these two goals.
Sometimes, decisions may support economic progress, leading to criticism from environmentalists. On the other hand, choices that prioritize the environment might upset those who support industries and development.
Who can file PIL?
In India, any citizen or organization can file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to address issues affecting the public. PILs can be filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 or the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The purpose of a PIL is to ensure justice in matters of public importance, especially for those unable to approach the court themselves.
To file a PIL, the petitioner must show that the case concerns public interest and will benefit society. It can only be filed against government bodies, such as the Central Government, State Governments, municipal authorities, or institutions under government control. Remember, PIL cannot be filed against private individuals or entities.
The court closely examines PILs to ensure they are genuine and not filed for personal gain or publicity. If found frivolous, the court can dismiss the petition.
This system lets people and groups bring up issues like protecting the environment, human rights, or getting basic services. It helps people ask for accountability and justice.
Illustrations of PIL in Environmental Protection
Public Interest Litigation in environmental law allows citizens to play a proactive role in safeguarding the environment, tackles pressing ecological issues, and ensures that governments and organizations are held accountable for their environmental responsibilities. See how PIL has led to transformative decisions in environmental law, addressing pollution, resource conservation, and ecological balance. Below are some key judgments in response to PIL:
M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (Vehicular Pollution in Delhi)
This case addressed air pollution caused by vehicular emissions in Delhi. The Supreme Court ruled that the rising pollution levels violated the right to life under Article 21 and directed all commercial vehicles in Delhi to switch to compressed natural gas (CNG). This judgment significantly reduced air pollution in the capital and set a precedent for clean energy adoption.
Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board v. M. V. Nayadu
This case addressed the rejection of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) by the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) for a vegetable oil plant near Himayat Sagar and Osman Sagar lakes. It was the crucial drinking water source for Hyderabad. The proposed unit was within the 10-kilometre restricted zone around these sensitive water bodies. The Supreme Court upheld the APPCB’s decision. They highlighted the precautionary principle and the need to protect sensitive water bodies from hazardous industries. The matter was referred to the National Environmental Appellate Authority for further assessment of pollution risks.
Goa Foundation v. Konkan Railways Corporation
In Goa Foundation v. Konkan Railways Corporation, the Bombay High Court addressed concerns over a railway project in Goa, alleging violations of Article 21, CRZ rules, and risks to Khazan paddy fields. Despite recognizing environmental concerns, the Court upheld the project as nationally significant, stating some ecological impact is inevitable for development. It also interpreted Section 11 of the Railways Act, 1989, to allow construction despite environmental laws.
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of India
In this important case, the Supreme Court condemned industries that released harmful chemicals like Oleum and H acid, violating the right to a safe and healthy environment, which is part of the right to life. The Court stressed the importance of strictly following environmental laws and holding industries accountable to protect public health and ecosystems.
One Lank Mark Case - Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum vs. Union of India
In this case, the Supreme Court addressed pollution from untreated tannery effluents in Tamil Nadu, which contaminated the Palar River. The Court ordered the creation of a pollution control authority, imposed a Rs. 10,000 fine on each tannery, mandated common effluent treatment plants, and closed non-compliant tanneries. It supported the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board’s guidelines and established a “Green Bench” in the Madras High Court for environmental cases, underscoring the need for stricter pollution control.
The Legal Framework for Environmental Protection in India
India’s commitment to environmental protection can be seen in its constitutional provisions and legislative framework:
Constitutional Provisions
Article 21: Establishes the right to a clean and healthy environment as part of the right to life.
Article 48A: Requires the government to protect and improve the environment, including forests and wildlife.
Article 51A(g): This urges citizens to help protect and improve the natural environment.
Key Environmental Laws
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974: It aims to prevent water pollution and manage its control.
The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981: It focuses on controlling air pollution by regulating industrial emissions.
The Environmental Protection Act, 1986: It provides an overarching framework for environmental regulation and enforcement.
The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980: It ensures forest conservation and regulates their diversion for non-forest purposes.
The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972: It protects wildlife habitats and regulates trade in wildlife products.
Conclusion
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has greatly improved environmental protection in India. Public Interest Litigation in environmental law empowers citizens, addresses challenges, and ensures legal accountability. It gives people a way to raise concerns about environmental issues, helping to promote sustainability. By holding officials accountable and spreading awareness, PIL has made laws for protecting the environment stronger.
However, problems like courts overstepping their role, misuse of PIL, and difficulties in following through on rulings need to be fixed to keep it effective. With the right measures in place, PIL can continue to play an important role in balancing environmental protection and development.
Also Check Out Other Topics in Environmental Law:
Sustainable Development in Environmental Law
Explore Law Shore: law notes today and take the first step toward mastering the fundamentals of law with ease.
